|
|
|
I was a guest the other day on a WJR-AM radio show in Detroit, talking about taming sprawl. Michigan's growing civic movement to stop the breakneck conversion of farms and forests into commercial strips and high-speed highways is a natural for conservatives, I said.
After all, conservation is about avoiding waste. And the political themes that have resonated throughout America in the 1980s and 1990s were built on messages of cutting taxes and subsidies, embracing traditional values, and giving local governments more authority in their communities.
Aren't these the same messages that residents bring to township boards as they build support for "Smart Growth" planning efforts that is, to rejuvenate Main Streets, preserve urban and rural neigh borhoods, and encourage economic development without creating sprawl?
The other guest on the radio show was a lawyer from the Detroit Chamber of Commerce. He said he was taking the conservative side, and argued that citizen-led efforts to change growth patterns are a threat to the economy, property rights, and personal liberty. Sprawl, he said, is a result of the free market at work, and a sign of economic strength. Americans love sprawl, he said after all, they choose to live in suburbs and shop at giant superstores.
I was astounded by his selective reasoning, even though I have heard it before from opponents of Smart Growth. In f act, sprawl is a gross distortion of the free market. It is a result of massive government subsidies pushed by pro-sprawl lobbyists for new roads, sewers, schools, corporate tax breaks, and other "economic development" incentives. A true free market would actually correct the distortions that promote sprawl. Moreover, opinion polls consistently find that most Americans loathe sprawl, feel hemmed in by their increasingly crowded suburbs, are tired of having to spend so much time in a car, and are looking for better choices.
The lawyer's strident comments are the emerging themes of a new counter-attack by a privileged few to convince voters that sprawl is good for us. We know better. Common sense also tells us that this issue goes beyond politics. Last November, for example, Americans transcended party affiliations and overwhelmingly approved most of the 200 local and state ballot measures around the country to protect farmland and open space, and rein in sprawl.
Thankfully for Michigan, there are members of the state Legislature who aren't succumbing to partisan politics and are pushing for Smart Growth initiatives. The Institute is right on top of this effort, and we will keep you posted through the Bulletin, our Web site, and special mailings on how you can contribute to its success.
Sprawl is a real concern for so many people stuck in traffic, paying outrageous taxes for new infrastructure, tired of the ugliness and anonymity of where they live. Having to deal with sprawl is reawakening in us a desire to participate in civic life. The Smart Growth movement unites people in an unprecedented way, and that's because it's an evolution of the values conservatives as well as liberals have long embraced. |
|
|
|